Julius Exner
Model undressing
1842

About the Item

Julius EXNER (Copenhagen, 1825 - Copenhagen, 1910) Model stripping Oil on canvas H. 122 cm; L. 74 cm Signed and dated 1842 lower right Exhibition: most likely Charlottenborg Salon of 1845, under number 110, titled Modelfigur, awarded with a silver medal Provenance: Emilio Fernando Bolt (c.1860 - 1944), acquired from the artist around 1900, then by descent Our painting was produced as part of the summer sessions organized between 1839 and 1850 by Christoffer Wilhelm Eckersberg (1783-1853), the master of Danish painting of the first half of the 19th century, in his private studio-apartment on the ground floor. floor at the Royal Academy of Fine Arts in Copenhagen. The master brought together a few students there between June and September, rented one or two models for the season, which were painted from different angles, the artists (including Eckersberg himself) sitting side by side. Eckersberg used to paint a fairly small version, the pupils of the larger formats. The work fits more generally into the legendary context of the research and reforms carried out by Eckersberg concerning the studies of nudes and in particular of female nudes, to make this exercise a genre of painting in its own right. Following his two-year stint in Jacques-Louis David's studio in Paris in 1811, Eckersberg had been made aware of work on the nude and in particular on live models, in natural light, while in Denmark the drawings were then only made from casts of antique models or other mannequins. In 1822, when he had been a professor there since 1818, it was he who had the Royal Academy of Copenhagen authorize the study of nudes, no longer in the evening by candlelight, but in natural light; from 1833, it was still he who allowed students to work on nude female models, even if the official authorization of the Academy did not take place until 1839. It was this same year that he instituted his summer sessions, on a private basis, to orient his painting and that of his students towards a new conception of the representation of models: even if the nude remains the real theme, it does not however, this is more than just an academic exercise. The subject is placed in a contemporary interior, with a rather sophisticated decor, and occupied with an intimate activity (it is this type of intimate vein that we will find later in Degas or Cassatt for example); thus in our painting, the young woman is supposed to take off her clothes to wash. The objective is that the viewer forgets that the master and his students are painting a model during a posing session, and that he instead has the impression of being alone with the model, but invisible, almost like a voyeur in spite of himself. Moreover, in these paintings, the model never looks towards the spectator, inducing a psychological distance with him, whereas model and artist are actually physically very close. On the other hand, it is not a question of idealized nudes either, even if Eckersberg, proof of his debt to the antique, chooses fairly classic models and poses. The sensuality is real and very present, with dreamy, even innocent, and timeless expressions (the models do not seem to have a defined age), suave and slow attitudes and movements, and especially with clothes that hide or reveal skillfully parts of the female body: upper buttocks, pronounced hips... Made by an artist under 20, our sensual painting is probably one of the most beautiful and spectacular produced by the students of Eckersberg during these summer sessions. With a perfect balance between the firmness of an ancient statue (it recalls the Venus de Milo) and the softness of the feminine forms, highlighted by a harmonious palette, it captures the attention with many details: the almost photographic folds white clothing and brown fabric placed on the armchair, the subtle gradation of green of the wall hanging, the pink tint of the extremities (feet, hands, face) reflecting the probable embarrassment of the model despite her professionalism, the carefully combed hair and veneered according to the fashion of the time (particularly in Denmark), the very realistic rendering of the glossy fabric of the seat of the armchair, the tiny reflection of the window in the varnish of the mahogany leg of the table, the play of light and shadows on the different materials, and above all the dialogue between the sinuosity of the back of the armchair and that of the young woman's body. No wonder he received a silver medal at the Charlottenborg Salon (the equivalent of our Paris Salon des Beaux-Arts) of 1845. Julius Exner, son of a Czech musician who emigrated to Denmark at the time of the Napoleonic wars, was trained in history painting by Lund (1777-1867) and by Eckersberg, before becoming from the 1850s the principal representative of "Danish Romanticism", with traditional and folkloric scenes of the Danish people, especially from the island of Amager. He traveled to Europe (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Italy) at the end of the 1860s, and notably to France, where he had already sent two paintings to the Paris Universal Exhibition of 1855 (he would still exhibit at that of Paris in 1878), and made several stays in Sweden where he was received as a member of the Royal Academy of Arts in Stockholm in 1866. He held several positions in the administration of Fine Arts in Denmark. The best-known painting from Exner's early years is the one, dated 1843, representing art students among the plaster sculptures of the Academy of Fine Arts in Copenhagen, and which will be exhibited at the Charlottenborg Salon in 1844 (it is now in the Staten Museum for Kunst in Copenhagen). But it seems that Exner had also participated in the 1842 edition with a drawing and that he obtained a silver medal there. The date of our table presents an uncertainty that has not yet been completely resolved. According to Eckersberg's diaries, usually kept in detail, there was no summer session in 1842 (as in 1845 and 1846). On the other hand, we find the same female model with a similar attitude in several works produced by Eckersberg and his students, a priori during the 1844 session (note that this session is the last for which we know of works). We know that this session took place in August and September, without the name of the model being specified (see note 1 for the details of the models between 1839 and 1843) and we know the participating students - Julius Exner, Joël Ballin (1822- 1885), Geskel Saloman (1821-1902), and a female artist, Caroline Behrens - and related works. The small painting (34.2 x 30.2 cm) by Eckersberg is held in a private Danish collection; the master amused himself by modifying the furniture, and the work is traditionally described as from 1844; but is it because the painting bears an inscription 1844 (and in this case, our work would undoubtedly have been produced in the same year), or is it only by analogy with the painting (102 x 77 cm, private collection) by Geskel Saloman, him -even signed and dated 1844? But the signature and the date of 1844 of the painting of Saloman were affixed later, in 1898, and one can wonder if Saloman, then 77 years old, would not have made a confusion with the real year of execution of his painting? As for the version by Joël Ballin (117 x 92 cm, Loeb Danish Art Collection, USA), it bears no date or signature, and was somehow given to the artist by elimination. In the end, despite the uncertain dates of the versions of Eckersberg and Saloman, the absence of references to a summer session in 1842 makes us think that our painting by Exner was executed in 1844. How then can this date be explained? from 1842? Perhaps Exner, on the occasion of the Charlottenborg Salon of 1845, he wanted, by dating his painting of 1842, to demonstrate a very precocious talent by making believe that he had been able to produce a small masterpiece only 17? Or, as we could speculate for the version of Saloman, did he affix this date with mistake in his old years, for example when he gave his painting to Fernando Bolt? Fernando Bolt's family had emigrated to South America around the middle of the 19th century, and he himself, a pastry chef by trade, was born in Peru, hence the Hispanic sounding of his first name. He returned regularly to Denmark, and it was in Copenhagen that his son Niels Peter (1886-1955) was born, who was a painter of landscapes, still lifes, portraits, inspired by Impressionism. It was during one of his stays in Denmark that Fernando had to meet Exner and could not resist acquiring this fascinating image from the Golden Age of Danish painting. Footnote 1 At the summer session of 1839 (August-September), it was Catherine (Trine) Nielsen who served as model, combing her hair: she was painted by Eckersberg (painting in the Louvre) and by her pupil Ludvig Smith (the painting, dated, is kept in the National Museum in Stockholm); Eckersberg's diary does not mention the names of the other students participating in this session. It was once thought that Smith first attended the sessions in 1840, but he was present in 1839. At the 1840 session, the models were Florentine (she posed from August 20 to September 1, and from September 14 to 19) and Nathalia Stahl (she posed at the beginning of the session on June 21). The small circular oil on copper (diameter 23 cm), painted by Eckersberg with Florentine as a model, is in the Odense Museum. In 1841, Florentine is still a model. During the period August 9-September 16, Smith painted a large format version (120 x 93 cm), held by the Loeb collection, similar

Creator:
Julius Exner (1825 - 1910, Danish)
Creation Year:
1842
Dimensions:
Height: 48.04 in (122 cm)Width: 29.14 in (74 cm)
Medium:
Canvas,Oil
Movement & Style:
French School
Period:
1840-1849
Condition:
Perfect condition. Cleaned.
Gallery Location:
BELEYMAS, FR
Reference Number:
1stDibs: LU1860211345562
View Invoice